「如今有更多美國人在工作，比我們國家歷史上的任何時刻都還要多」
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
。关于这个话题，heLLoword翻译官方下载提供了深入分析
Not the day you're after? Here's the solution to today's Connections.
（二）直接关系当事人或者第三人重大权益，经过听证程序的；